
We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Kawanishi E13K1 Experimental 12-Shi Three-seat Reconnaissance Seaplane
The Kawanishi E13K1 Experimental 12-Shi Three-seat Reconnaissance Seaplane was an unsuccessful attempt to design an aircraft to replace the Navy Type 94 Reconnaissance Seaplane E7K.
In 1937 the Japanese Navy asked Aichi and Kawanishi to produce three-seat long-range reconnaissance aircraft capable of being launched from a catapult but also of operating from shore bases. Kawanishi responded with a low-wing twin-float monoplane of all metal construction apart from the fabric covered control surfaces. The crew of three sat in tandem in a covered cockpit with a greenhouse style canopy that sloped down towards the rear.
The first prototype made its maiden flight on 28 September 1938 and went to the Navy in October for tests against the Aichi E13A1. The Aichi aircraft was faster, easier to maintain and handle on deck, while the Kawanishi aircraft was more manoeuvrable and had a better rate of climb. The maintenance and deck handling problems counted against the Kawanishi design, and the Aichi E13A1 was accepted for production.
Both of the Kawanishi prototypes suffered from accidents. On the first prototype this was triggered by excessive vibration in flight. The second prototype disappeared during a test flight and was never recovered.
Engine: Mitsubishi Kinsei 3 kai fourteen cylinder double-row air-cooled radial engine
Power: 910-1,030hp
Crew: 3
Span: 47ft 6.5in
Length: 38ft 5.5in
Height: 14ft 7.25in
Empty weight: 4,784lb
Loaded weight: 7,826lb
Max speed: 218mph
Climb Rate: 9min 14sec to 13,123ft
Service ceiling: 21,948ft
Endurance: 16 hours
Armament: One flexibly mounted dorsal 7.7mm machine gun
Bomb load: One 551lb or four 132lb bombs
List of aircraft (K)
This is a list of aircraft in alphabetical order by manufacturer beginning with K.
Bohatyrew
Kaddy
(Douglas Kaddy, West Groton CT. )
Kadiak
(Everett E David, Detroit MI.)
Kaess
(Kaess Aircraft Engr Co, NJ.)
Korea Aerospace Industries Ltd. (commonly referred to as KAI, Korean: 한국항공우주산업, Hanja: 韓國航空宇宙産業)
Kairys
Kaiser
(Daniel (or Donald?) Kaiser, Chicago IL. )
Kaiser
(Daniel Kaiser, Milwaukee WI. ) (May be Kiser)
Kaiser-Fleetwings
Kaiser-Hammond
(Kaiser-Stearman Aircraft Co, Oakland CA. )
Kalec (aircraft constructor)
Kalgoorlie
Kalinauskas, Rolandas
(Rolandas Kalinauskas, Prienai, Lithuania)
Kalinin OKB
Kalkert
Kam-Craft
Kaman
((Charles H) Kaman Aircraft Corp, Bradley Field, Windsor Locks CT. 1953: Bloomfield CT. 1967: Kaman Corp. 1969: Kaman Aerospace division. )
Kamerton-N
Kaminskas
(Rim (or Ray) Kaminskas, Chino CA. )
Kamov
- [5][5][5] "Hat" "Hen" "Hog" "Harp" Vintokryl "Hoop" "Hormone" "Hoodlum-A" "Helix-A" "Helix" "Helix-B" "Helix-E" "Helix-C" and "Helix-D" "Hokum-A" "Hokum-B" "Hoodlum-B" "Hoodlum-C"
Kansas City
(Kansas City Aircraft Co (pres: George or Gordon L Bennett), Richards Field, Kansas City MO. )
Kanter-Moissant
Kapferer
Kappa 77
Kaproni Bulgarski
(Caproni Bulgara SA / Samoletna Fabrika Kaproni Bulgarski)
- (Papillon - Butterfly) - (Ca.100) [7] (Tchuchuliga - Lark) - (Ca.113) [7] (Ca.113) [7] (Tchuchuliga I - Lark I) - (Ca.113) [7] (Tchuchuliga II - Lark II) - (Ca.113) [7] (Tchuchuliga III - Lark III) - (Ca.113) [7] (Papagal -Parrot) - (Ca.309 Ghibli) [7] (Fazan -Pheasant) [7] (Ca.311) [7]
Karhumäki
(Veljekset Karhumäki O/Y / Karhumäen veljekset)
Kari-Keen
(Kari-Keen Aircraft Inc (fdrs: Ernest A Arndt, Swen Swanson, W W Wilson, one other unnamed), 509-511 Plymouth St, Sioux City IA )
Kasyanenko
(Kievskogo Politiechnicheskogo Instituta - KPI)
Kauffman
(K K Kauffman, Pittsburgh PA. )
Kaufmann
(Charles H Kaufmann, 49 Poinier St, Newark NJ. )
Kaufmann
Kawanishi
(Kawanishi Kokuki kk - Kawanishi Aircraft Company Ltd.)
Kawasaki
(Kawasaki Kokuki Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha - Kawasaki Aircraft Engineering Company Limited)
Kayaba Industry
Kazan
Kazyanenko
(Yevgeny, Ivan and Andrei Kazyanenko)
KB SAT
(Sovremyenne Aviatsyonne Tekhnologii - Modern Aircraft Technologies)
(Greek: Κρατικό Εργοστάσιο Αεροπλάνων - State Aircraft Factory)
Keane
((Horace) Keane Aeroplanes, North Beach, Long Island NY. c.1921: Acquired rights to ACE (Aircraft Engr Co, NY). c.1925: Keane Aircraft Corp, Keyport NJ. )
(Charles F Keen, Madison WI. )
Keitek
(Keitek srl, Remanzacco, Italy)
Keleher
Keller
(Henry S "Pop" Keller, Chicago IL. )
Keller
Kellett
((W Wallace & Roderick G) Kellett Autogiro Corporation, Philadelphia PA. )
Kellis
Kellner-Béchereau
(Avions Kellner-Béchereau)
Kellogg
(Harold W Kellogg, Ontario CA.)
Kelly
(John Henry Kelly, El Dorado AR )
Kelly
(Dudley R Kelly, Versailles, Kentucky, United States)
Kelly
Kember
(Scott Kember, Sacramento CA. )
Kendall
(George C Distel & Ralph A Kendall, Le Sueur MN. )
Kendall
Kennedy
(Kennedy Aeroplanes Limited)
Kensgaila
(Kensgaila Aircraft Enterprize / Vladas Kensgaila)
Kensinger
(Ned Kensinger, Fort Worth TX. )
Kentucky
(Kentucky Aircraft Co, Owensboro, KY. )
Kenyon
(Harold & Kenneth Kenyon, Warren OH.)
Kerestesi
(Charles A Kerestesi, Elgin IL. )
Kerrison
(Dr Davenport Kerrison, Jacksonville FL.)
Kersey-Hudgins-Kennedy
(C C Kersey, James Hudgins, Virgil Kennedy, Ft Worth TX.)
Kestrel
(Kestrel Aircraft Co (fdr: Donald L Stroud), Norman OK.)
Kestrel Aircraft Company
Ketner
Keystone
(Kharkovskii Aviatsionny Institut - Kharkov Aviation Institute, aka Kharkivskii Aviatsionny Institut - Kharkiv Aviation Institute)
(KkAZ - Kharkov Aviatsionny Zavod - Kharkov State Aviation Plant)
Khioni
(Vassili Nikolayevich Khioni)
(Kazan Helicopters Plant, Kazan, Tatarstan)
Kieger
(Flugzeugbau Kiel G.m.b.H.)
Killingsworth
(Richard Killingsworth, Ft Walton Beach FL. )
Kimball
Kimball
((Wilbur R) Kimball Aircraft Corp, Naugatuck CT. )
Kimbell
Kimberley
Kimbrel
Kinetic
King's
(King's Engineering Fellowship and Angel Aircraft Corp, Orange City IA. )
Kingsford-Smith
Kinman
Kinner
(Kinner Airplane & Motor Corporation)
Kinney
(Cleveland, Ohio, United States)
Kippers
(Harold M Kippers, Mukwonago WI. )
Kirkham
(Kirkham Aeroplane & Motor Co, Bath NY. )
Kirkham-Williams
((Charles B) Kirkham and (Alford) Williams, Long Island NY. )
Kirsten
(Prof Frederick K Kirsten, University of WA. )
Kistler
Kjeller
(Kjeller Flyvemaskinsfabrik)
Kjolseth
(Lt. Col. Paul Kjolseth RNoAF)
Klampher
Klassen
Klein
Klemm
(Leichtflugzeugbau Klemm GmbH)
Kline
Klinedorf
Knabenshue
(Roy Knabenshue, Los Angeles CA. )
Knapp
(Frank Knapp, Palmer, Alaska)
Knepper
((Paul H) Knepper Aircraft, Lehighton PA. )
Knight Twister
Knoll
((Felix W A) Knoll Aircraft Company, 471 W 1st St, Wichita KS. )
Knoll
(Richard Knoll, Ogallala NB. )
Knoll-Brayton
((Felix W A) Knoll-(---) Brayton Aeronautical Corp, Norwich CT. )
Knoller
Knöpfli
Knowles (aircraft constructor)
Knowlton (aircraft constructor)
Knowlton
Kobe Steel
Kochyerigin
Kocjan
(Kara Ostas Darbnica - Latvia)
Koechlin
Koehl
(Dr. Hermann Koehl and Ernst Von Loessl)
Koehler
Koenig
(Stefan Kohl, Kattenes, Germany)
Koivu and Toomey
(Fitchburg, MA)Koivu and Toomey
Kokusai
((Homer) Kolb Co Inc, Phoenixville PA. )
New Kolb Aircraft
Kolitilin-Nikitin
(Ben Kolitilin and Misha Nikitin)
KOMTA
(Kommissii po Tyazheloi Aviatsii - Commission for Heavy Aviation)
Kompol
(Kompol SC, Swiercze, Poland)
Kondor
(Kondor Flugzeugwerke G.m.b.H.)
Konstruktionskontor Nord
(Konstruktionskontor Nord - Flugzeugbau Nord)
Koolhoven
(Sytse Frederick Willem Koolhoven see also Armstrong-Whitworth and B.A.T.)
(manufactured at Maatschappij voor Luchtvaart 1911)
(Manufactured at Nationale Vliegtuig Industrie - NVI 1922-1926)
Korchagin
Korean Air
Korolyev OKB
Korsa
(Korsa aeroplane factory - Hugo G. Schmid)
Kortenbach & Rauh
Korvin
Koslowski
(Charles D Kozlowski, Raritan NJ. )
Kowalke
(Levern P Kowalke, Wall Lake IA. )
(Young Ho Koun, Roosevelt Field, NYC. )
Kovaks
Kozlov
- (Prozrachnyy Samlyot - transparent aircraft) (Eksperimentalnyi Istrebitel - experimental fighter) [5][41][5]
Kraft
(KEA: Kratiko Ergostasio Aeroplanon - State Aircraft Factory)
Kraemer
(L A Kraemer, Rapid City SD. )
Kraft
Kramme & Zeuthen
Krapish
((Alexander Peter) Krapish Aircraft Co, Kearney NJ & Squantum MA. )
Krasniye Kryl'ya
Krauss
Kreider-Reisner
((Ammon "Amos" H) Kreider-(Lewis E) Reisner Flying Service. 1927: Kreider-Reisner Aircraft Co, Hagerstown MD. 1929: Acquired by Fairchild Aircraft Corp. )
From Konan to Kanoya: The Wanderings and Wallowings of Emily c/n 426
Mar. 1943 | Built as Type 2 Model 12 (H8K2) at Kawanishi’s Konan Plant, Hyogo Prefecture, handed over directly to 802nd Kōkūtai (Naval Air Group) as ‘N1-26’ (FAoW No. 184 includes profile) |
1943 | Serves with 802nd, then operating primarily from Jaluit Atoll (Marshall Islands), and Makin in Gilbert Islands (now part of Kiribati) |
Sept. 1943 | 802nd tail code changed to Y4 (aircraft’s to Y4-26?) |
(Above and below) Emily c/n 426 was lucky to avoid suffering a similar fate to this sister aircraft,
destroyed during the U.S. invasion of Makin in November 1943.
(Photos: [above] via YouTube [link] [below] National Archives and Records
Administration via Wikimedia Commons)
Jan. 1944 | (29th) 802nd relocates to Saipan in the Marianas, aircraft possibly one of those temporarily deployed to Truk (now Chuuk, Micronesia) |
Apr. 1944 | (1st) Passed to 801st Kōkūtai on Saipan as ‘801-86’ |
July 1944 | (10th) 801st Kōkūtai returns to Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture |
Jan. 1945 | (1st) 801st becomes part of Maritime Escort General Headquarters |
Feb. 1945 | (11th) Upon 801st’s disbandment, aircraft passed to Japan-based 5th Naval Air Wing, becomes Takuma Air Group ‘T-31’ at Takuma, Kagawa Prefecture (part of same unit’s Kikusui [Floating Chrysanthemum] Force from Apr. 25, 1945) until disbandment on Aug. 22, 1945 |
Oct. 1945 | Having survived the war with only minor damage, aircraft also lucky to be selected for evaluation from three aircraft found at Takuma other two destroyed on site |
Nov. 1945 | (11th, possibly 13th) Having been repaired by former IJNAF maintenance team from Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, flown for last time in Japan from Takuma back to Yokohama by war veteran crew for transshipment to United States |
Dec. 1945 | (10th) Now bearing U.S. national markings, loaded aboard U.S. Navy transport vessel for voyage across Pacific |
Jan. 1946 | Offloaded for initial evaluation at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington |
The aircraft sports U.S. markings for her initial evaluation at NAS Whidbey Island in Washingtom
state in 1946. The span of the outer wing alone was roughly equivalent to that of a Zero fighter.
(Photo: via YouTube [link])
Feb. 1946 | Having been transferred to another vessel for passage through Panama Canal, arrives in Norfolk, Virginia, for reassembly |
May 1946 | (23rd) Makes what is to prove to be sole flight in United States when ferried from NAS Norfolk to test centre at Patuxent River, Maryland |
Aug. 1946 | (22nd) Taxy tests on Patuxent River start |
Jan. 1947 | (30th) Test programme in United States ceases due to engine failure after 12.6 hours of operations |
(Above and below) Two views of the aircraft during evaluation at the Patuxent River test centre. That
above is one of a series of photos taken during the evaluation of spray patterns. This image shows
that generated when the aircraft weighed 49,900 pounds (22,630kg) and was taxied at 20 knots.
(Photos: [above] U.S. Navy via Wikimedia Commons [below] from Apr.1952 issue of
The World’s Aircraft, used with permission of Hobun Shorin, Co., Ltd.)
Feb. 1947 | Transported back to Norfolk by road and placed in open-air storage |
1949 | Decision made to remove wings and formally preserve aircraft in rubber protective coating |
The aircraft surrounded by a scaffold to facilitate mothballing at NAS Norfolk in 1949.
(Photo via Wikimedia Commons)
Late 1959 | (Reported in Feb. 1960 issue of Aireview) Aircraft’s lead designer and then Shin Meiwa company advisor Dr. Shizuo Kikuhara (1906–1991) travels to NAS Norfolk at U.S. Navy’s invitation, agreement in principle reached on aircraft’s return |
Sept. 1960 | Starboard outer engine sheared off when aircraft blown over in Hurricane Donna |
June 1978 | U.S. Department of Defense plans to scrap aircraft to save money come to attention of well-connected former politician and influential business figure as well as first Museum of Maritime Science curator Ryōichi Sasakawa, who is instrumental in arranging repatriation and preservation procedures |
A photo of Ryōichi Sasakawa (1899–1995) on the cover of a biography published in 1978,
the title of which describes him as being unprecedented (or unconventional). That an
example of an Emily still exists is in no small part due to the efforts of this one-time
controversial political and business figure, who went on to receive wide acclaim for
the charitable contributions of the Nippon Foundation he had launched in 1962 (link).
Oct. 1978 | U.S. House of Representatives officially decides to make aircraft first spoils of war item to be returned to Japan |
Apr. 1979 | Type 2 Flying Boat Repatriation Executive Committee formed |
Apr. 1979 | (23rd) Attended by Sasakawa, ceremony held at NAS Norfolk to mark return to Japanese ownership. (Aircraft still lacks starboard outer engine) |
May 1979 | Disassembled and cocooned for transshipment at NAS Norfolk |
June 1979 | (19th) Loaded aboard container ship New Jersey Maru |
July 1979 | (13th) Arrives at Port of Tokyo, transferred by floating crane to Museum of Maritime Science, ‘lands’ back on Japanese soil for first time in 35 years |
Feb. 1980 | Restoration work begins |
June 1980 | (3rd) Lifted by crane into display position |
June 3, 1980. Mounted on the back of a trailer minus its outer engines and wing sections, the Type 2
Flying Boat is slowly maneuvered into position at what will be its home for the next 24 years.
(Photo courtesy of Museum of Maritime Science, Tokyo [link])
July 1980 | (14th) Restoration work completed (link) |
July 1980 | (15th) Aircraft’s interior shown to press |
July 1980 | (20th) Tape-cutting ceremony held on first day on public display at Museum of Maritime Science. Event attended by former Lt. Cdr. Tsuneo Hitsuji (1914–1995), who as last CO of Takuma Air Group had piloted aircraft on ferry flight to Yokohama in Nov. 1945 |
One of the scenes of celebration on July 20, 1980, to mark the first day the aircraft was officially open
to public view in its original, post-restoration state.
(Photo courtesy of Museum of Maritime Science, Tokyo)
Jan. 21–Mar. 26, 1982 | Surrounded by scaffolding for long-term preservation work, including application of special paint (see photo below) |
Mar. 27, 1982 | Ceremony marking completion of long-term preservation work conducted by Shinto priest |
The aircraft is pictured here during the process of applying two coats of a green polyurethane aircraft
coating, which was an exact match for the former IJNAF dark green, to her upper surfaces and the
sides of the boat hull, February 27, 1982. (Photo courtesy of Museum of Maritime Science, Tokyo)
(Above and below) Fast forward to July 1998 and two more views of the Emily at the Museum of
Maritime Science, already 16 years after the first application of the special protective paint. Mention should also be made of the long-term preservation efforts, which included controlling the
temperature of the interior, conducted during the 34 years the Emily was U.S. government property.
Events of 2004 | |
Dec. 2003 | Aircraft’s management transferred from Museum of Maritime Science to then Japan Defense Agency (now Ministry of Defense), decision made to move aircraft to Kanoya |
Feb. 2 | Dismantling works starts |
Mar. 3 | Loaded aboard cargo vessel at Tokyo |
Mar. 7 | Offloaded at Port of Kagoshima |
Mar. 8 | Early in morning, arrives by road at JMSDF Kanoya |
Apr.26 | On outdoor display at JMSDF Museum |
Primary Reference Sources:
Ni-shiki Hikōtei (Type 2 Flying Boat), Famous Airplanes of the World No. 184 (Bunrindo [Japan], March 2018)
H8K Emily Type 2 Flying Boat, Aero Detail No. 31 (DaiNippon Kaiga [Japan], 2003)
Ni-shiki Ōgata Hikōtei (Type 2 Large Flying Boat), Museum of Maritime Science Guide 2, 2002
Ni-shiki Hikōtei (Type 2 Flying Boat), Famous Airplanes of the World No. 49 (Bunrindo [Japan], November 1994)
http://arawasi-wildeagles.blogspot.jp/2017/01/kawanishi-h8k-pt1.html
https://www.pacificwrecks.com/aircraft/h8k/426.html
http://dansa.minim.ne.jp/CL-NisikiDaitei-1.htm
Kanoya, January 2014. Although tethered down, there must be some concern that the aircraft, which
suffered hurricane damage in 1960, will fall victim to one of Japan’s many typhoons.
(Photo: Miya.m via Wikimedia Commons) The aircraft’s weight is also well supported on struts. Visible just behind the main front underside strut is
the bomb aimer’s window, which in the case of this aircraft reportedly saw very little use. The white boxes
above the undercarriage dollies are floats, used in conjunction with fishing net-type flotation devices to
retrieve each 1,850lb (840kg) twin-wheel dolly when jettisoned prior to takeoff.
(Photo: Miya.m via Wikimedia Commons [Jan. 2014])
(Above and below) The first prototype of what was then known as the 13-Shi Large Flying Boat first flew
on December 31, 1940, and is shown here during flight tests on Osaka Bay from Kawanishi’s Konan Plant
the following month. In the meantime, the top of the aircraft’s tail had undergone modification, as had the
boat hull beneath the nose by the addition of a so-called katsuobushi (piece of dried bonito) strake to
to reduce the spray that had caused problems during the takeoff run for its maiden flight. A total of
17 H8K1 aircraft had been built at Kawanishi’s Naruo Plant by 1943, when production switched to the
H8K2 version at the Konan Plant. The World’s Aircraft for June 1953 claims an astounding 111 aircraft
were built there in 1943, followed by 67 in 1944 and just two in 1945, for a total of 180 aircraft.
(Photos from June 1953 issue of The World’s Aircraft, used with permission of Hobun Shorin, Co., Ltd.)
Pictured at Kawanishi’s Naruo Plant on November 30, 1943, directly after completion, is the 68th Type 2
Model 12 Flying Boat converted as the first production example of what was then provisionally
designated as the Seikū (Clear Sky) Model 32. The propeller blades were unpainted and the
aircraft sported red ‘identification friend or foe’ stripes on the leading edges of its wings.
A total of 15 aircraft of this version were completed.
(Photo from June 1953 issue of The World’s Aircraft, used with permission of Hobun Shorin, Co., Ltd.)
The view forward to the aircraft commander’s seat and flight deck from the radio operator’s position
on the first Seikū transport aircraft.
(Photo from June 1953 issue of The World’s Aircraft, used with permission of Hobun Shorin, Co., Ltd.)
The Seikū transport aircraft could accommodate a maximum of 64 passengers in a troop-style seating
arrangement on two decks. Depicting the first aircraft specially prepared for a photo shoot,
its operational appearance was likely somewhat different.
(Photo from June 1953 issue of The World’s Aircraft, used with permission of Hobun Shorin, Co., Ltd.)
Nicknamed Asahi (旭) , this is another of the Yokohama Naval Station-based Seikū Model 32
transports mentioned in the review of the Famous Planes of the World book on the Emily (link) .
The book (p. 49) contains the scene, soon after the war’s end, of six aircraft congregated on the
ramp at Negishi, where this photo was taken. Of note is the aforementioned katsuobushi strake
under the nose, the design fix first added to the 13- Shi prototype to reduce spray and alleviate
the aircraft’s tendency to porpoise on takeoff runs.
(Photo from Nov. 1956 issue of The World’s Aircraft, used with permission of Hobun Shorin, Co., Ltd.)
A lone Emily sits forlornly on the shore having seemingly run aground at the now wrecked Hiro Naval
Arsenal in Hiroshima Prefecture, where some of the type’s smaller predecessors had been developed
during the interwar years. The remains of the facility’s slipway are in the right background.
(Below) A close-up of the above photo, which was likely taken soon after the end of the war, reveals the
aircraft to be a Seikū Model 32 transport bearing the tail code 11Ko-21, 11Ko having been that assigned
to the 11th Naval Arsenal at Hiro. Hiroshi Ebi’s caption for this photo in FAoW No. 184 states that the
patch at the rear centre of the main wing covers a hole made to facilitate the replacement of a fuel tank.
Easy targets, more than half the total of 36 Seikū transports built fell victim to marauding U.S. fighters.
(Photo: San Diego Air and Space Museum via Wikimedia Commons)
Further reading
Information as of: 07.07.2020 09:48:41 CEST
Changes: All pictures and most design elements which are related to those, were removed. Some Icons were replaced by FontAwesome-Icons. Some templates were removed (like “article needs expansion) or assigned (like “hatnotes”). CSS classes were either removed or harmonized.
Wikipedia specific links which do not lead to an article or category (like “Redlinks”, “links to the edit page”, “links to portals”) were removed. Every external link has an additional FontAwesome-Icon. Beside some small changes of design, media-container, maps, navigation-boxes, spoken versions and Geo-microformats were removed.
List of aircraft (W)
This is a list of aircraft in alphabetical order beginning with 'W'.
WAACO
(West Australian Aircraft Company - WAACO)
Wabash
(Wabash Aircraft Co, Terre Haute IN.)
(Wilmington Aero Club, Wilmington DE.)
Wackett
(1920 Weaver Aircraft Co 1923: Advance Aircraft Co. 1928: Waco Aircraft Co.)
- Early Waco types
- [3][3][3][3][3][3]
- (Variants of Waco 10 - open cockpit biplanes 1927-9)
- series
- SO series (Straightwing)
- TO series (Taperwing)
- (2-seat side-by-side biplanes 1932–1933)
- BA series
- CA series
- LA series
- biplanes (1932-1938)
- DC series
- EC series
- IC series
- JC series
- KC series
- KC-S series
- JC-S series
- KS series
- sesquiplanes (1935-1938)
- GC series
- QC series
- UC series
- OC series
- (Military biplanes 1934-37)
- [3][3][3][3][3][3]
- Executive "Aristocrat" cabin biplanes (1939)
- tandem 2/3-seat open cockpit biplanes (1930–1937)
- BF series
- CF series
- MF series
- NF series
- PF series
- tricycle/nosewheel gear cabin biplanes (1937-1938)
- Military Aircraft
- (Cancelled Transport) (designation for all Wacos impressed into USAAC/USAAF) (troop glider) (troop glider) (powered glider) (US Navy designation for UBF used for trapeze experiments on flying aircraft carriers) (USCG designation for EGC-7) (USAAC designation for primary trainer based on UPF-7)
- Misc Waco Types
- pusher cabin monoplane (1930 National Air Tour Special, two CRGs only) (ad hoc aircraft built by Waco employees) [3] (powered glider) [3] (Primary glider) [3][3] (low-wing monoplane military trainer) [3]
(Waco Aircraft Co Inc (fdrs: Rich & Linda Melhoff), Forks WA.)
Wadsworth
WAG-Aero
Wagner
Wagner
(Harold A Wagner, 4539 NE 21 St, Portland OR.)
Wagner
(Helikopter Technik Munchen - Wagner)
Wagner
((Fred G) Wagner Aircraft Co Inc, San Diego CA.)
Wagner
Wainfan
(Barnaby Wainfan, Long Beach CA.)
Wainscott
Waitamo Aircraft
Walco
(Weckler-Armstrong-Lillie Co, 2717 Irving Park Blvd, Chicago IL.)
Walden
( Dr Henry W Walden, Mineola NY. )
Walden
((Henry?) Walden-(Roscoe) Markey Inc, Strickland & Bassett Aves, Mill Basin NY.)
Waldroop
(Arthur L Waldroop, Palmyra NB.)
Walker-Greve
(Fred & Herman Greve, Detroit MI)
Walkerjet
Wallace
( (Stanley) Wallace Aircraft Co, 4710 Irving Park Blvd, Chicago IL)
Wallace Brothers
(Frank C and Fred M Wallace, Bettendorf IA.)
Wallis
Wallis
(Stanley B Wallis, Ypsilanti MI.)
Wallman
(Fred W Wallman Jr, Minneapolis MN.)
Walraven
(L.W. Walraven, Bandoeng, Java)
Walsh
(San Diego Aeroplane Mfg Co (fdr: Charles Francis Walsh), San Diego CA.)
Walsh Brothers
(Walsh Brothers, New Zealand)
Walter
(Dale "Red" Walter & Roy Campbell, Severy KS.)
(War Aircraft Replicas, Brandon, Florida)
Warbird
Warchalowski
Warner
(Arthur P Warner, Beloit WI.)
Warner Aerocraft
(Warner Aerocraft Company, Seminole, Florida, United States)
Warner-Young
Warren
(W H "Glen" Warren, San Luis Obispo CA.)
Warren & Young
Warrior
(Warrior Aeronautical Corp, Alliance OH)
Warwick
(William Warwick, Torrance CA)
Washington
(Washington Aeroplane Co, College Park MD.)
Washington Aeroprogress
Washington Navy Yard
(Wasp Airplane Co, 3440 Boston Ave and 1044 51 Ave, Oakland CA.)
Waspair
Wasp Systems
(Later Wasp Flight Systems, Crook, Cumbria, United Kingdom)
Wassmer
- : [13][14] First flight August 1956. Later referred to as the Javelot I. : [15] First flight 25 March 1958. : First flight 26 June 1961. Modified forward fuselage and swept fin. [16] : [16] 1964 model, with increased outer wing dihedral. [17]
Watanabe
(KK Watanabe Tekkosho - Watanabe Iron Works Ltd.) (from 1943 - Kyushu Aeroplane Company Ltd. q.v.)
Water-based Aircraft Design & Research Institute
Waterhouse
( (William J) Waterhouse & (Lloyd) Royer Aircraft, Glendale CA.)
Waterman
(Waterman Aircraft Mfg Co, 3rd & Sunset, Venice CA. (Watkins Aircraft Co (pres: Everett Watkins), Wichita KS.) (Taylor Watkinson Aircraft Company, UK) (Watson Windwagon Company / Gary Watson, Newcastle TX.) (WD Flugzeug Leichtbau / Wolfgang Dallach) ((John C) Weatherly Aviation Co Inc, Hollister CA.) (Ray Weatherly & Bill Campbell, Dallas TX.) (Goodwin K Weaver & Oliver Wellet, aka Weaver Air Service, 353 S Audubon Rd, Indianapolis IN.) (Marshal D Webber, Jefferson OH.) ( (James R) Wedell-(Harry P) Williams Air Service Corp, Patterson LA.) (Elling O Weeks and E A "Gus" Riggs, Terre Haute IN.) (Fred E Weick, 130 Cherokee Rd, Hampton VA.) ((George) Weidmann Body & Trailer Co, North Tonawanda NY.) (Lehman Weil, 225 West 71 St, New York NY.) ((Orin) Welch Aircraft Co, Anderson IN. / Welch Aviation Co.) (R C Lusk & R M Weller, Burbank CA.) (Harry Wellington, Ontario CA.) (George T Welsh, Long Beach CA.) (Burdette Star Welsher, 519 High St, San Luis Obispo CA.) ((Robert) Wendt Aircraft Corp, 825 Main St, N Tonawanda NY.) ((Harold O) Wendt Aircraft Engr, La Mesa CA.) (C M Matson & Harlan Werkheiser, Bloomsburg PA.) (Joseph K Wesley, Somerset KY.) (Russell West, Atlanta (GA?) Packard Co.) (West Coast Air Service Inc, Portland OR.) (Westbrook Aeronautical Corp (fdrs: John Knox McAfee, Neil Westbrook Perdew), Teterboro, NJ) (Western Aircraft Supplies, Calgary Alberta Canada.) (Western Airplane & Supply Co, Burbank CA.) (Western Airplane Co, 53 W Jackson Blvd, Chicago IL.) (Western Aircraft Corp (pres: Georges Hamilton), San Antonio TX.) (Western Aircraft Corp, 521 Cooper Bldg, Denver CO.) (Western Aircraft Supplies) (Miles Westfall, Oklahoma City OK and New Richmond IN.) (Westfield Aircraft Co (Summit Aeronautical Corp), Westfield MA.) (Charles Terres Weymann / Société des Avions C.T.Weymann) (Martin Wezel Flugzeugtechnik) (Puget-Pacific Airplane Co Tacoma WA.) (Ken Wheeler / Wheeler Technology) (Ron Wheeler Aircraft (Slaes) Pty. Ltd.) (Wheeling Aircraft Co, Pontiac MI.) (Whitcraft Corp, Eastford CT.) (George D White, 117 E 49 St, Los Angeles CA.) (George White, St Augustine FL.) ((Donald G) White Aircraft Co, Woodward Airport, Leroy NY) (William T White, Dallas TX.) (E Marshall White, Huntington Beach CA.) ( (Burdette S & Harold L) White's Aircraft, Ames IA) ((Benjamin) White-(Hans) Kremsreiter, Milwaukee WI.) (Whitehead Aircraft Company) (Gustave Whitehead (Gustav Weisskopf), Bridgeport CT.) (Lawrence Henry Whiteman, Wichita KS.) (Earl E Whitman, Point Richmond CA.) (Dean-Wilson Aviation Ltd / C.W. "Bill" Whitney) (Michael Whittaker, Clayton, Yorkshire, United Kingdom) (Whittelsey Mfg Co, 220 Howard St, Bridgeport CT.) ((Harris) Whittemore-(?) Hamm Co, Saugus MA.) (Clem Whittenbeck, Greenwood MO, Lincoln NB and Miami OK.) (Société des Avions Michel Wibault) Wib.4 heavy bomber project? Wib.5 single-seat parasol-wing fighter project, submitted to C.1 1923 Wib.6 two-seat parasol-wing fighter derivative of Wib.5 Wib.11 single-seat fighter project powered by one 500 hp engine, for C.1 1923 Wib.14 two-seat parasol-wing tourist aircraft project Wib.14H a floatplane version of Wib.14 Wib.15 single-seat fighter project to C.1 1926 contest Wib.160 Trombe II a more powerful version of Wib.130 Trombe I, also for C.1 1926 Wib.170 single-seat lightweight fighter for C.1 1926 Wib.230 three-engined transport aircraft project? Wib.270 single-seat lightweight fighter project for C.1 1928 Wib.330 transport aircraft (no more details) Wib.340 two-seat low-wing tourist aircraft project (Wichita Airplane Mfg Co (C A Noll, Anson O Rorabaugh), 716 (?>912) W 1st St, Wichita KS.) (Widerøes Flyveselskap) (John C Wieber, Milwaukee WI.) (William Weinberg, Kansas City, Missouri, United States) (Ronald Wier, San Diego, California, United States) (Confusion may reign here:- Owner:J. Samuel White, Designer Howard T. Wright, Company Name Wight Aircraft Co.) (H F Wilcox Aeronautics Inc, Verdigris OK.) (Charles A Wilder, Bronson MI.) (Wiley Post Aircraft Corp, Oklahoma City OK) (Charles F Willard, Hempstead NY and Los Angeles CA.) (J Newton Williams, Ansonia CT.) (O E Williams Aeroplane Co (fdrs: Osbert Edwin & Inez Williams), Scranton PA.) (Beryl J Williams Co, Venice & Pasadena CA.) (Szekely Aircraft & Engine Co, Holland MI.) (Art Williams and Guy Gully, Alliance OH.) (Robert F Williams, Houston TX.) (Floyd Williams, Eagle Grove IA.) ((Sam B) Williams Intl, Walled Lake MI.) (Texas Aero Mfg Co (fdr: George W Williams), Temple TX. ) (Roger Williamson, San Antonio TX.) (Capt Hugh L. Willoughby, Newport RI.) (Santa Ana, California, United States and later Orange, California) (John H Wilson, Middlesex PA.) (Al & Herbert Wilson, Ocean Park CA.) (Wilson & Co, 529 W Douglas, Wichita KS.) ((Dr Frank M) Wilson Aircraft Company, Los Angeles CA.) (James Wilson, Los Angeles CA.) ((George S) Wing Aircraft Co/Hi-Shear Corp, 2660 Skypark Dr, Torrance CA.) See the Real Life page for non-fictional examples. Nippon Rikukaigunki Daihyakka (IJAAF/IJNAF Aircraft Encyclopaedia) Launched in September 2009 (at 790 yen), this collection offers a die-cast precision model of an IJAAF or IJNAF aircraft (in 1/87, 1/100 or 1/120 scale) with an accompanying magazine every two weeks. Sporting faithfully reproduced contemporary colours and markings—even down to the “no step” warnings on wings—the sturdy models include not only the famous types but also the lesser known aircraft that are popular among aviation enthusiasts. During the course of 2015, the publisher has been straying away from the series title somewhat by including Allied and even German aircraft subjects. The magazine content is divided into eight categories fighters, attack aircraft, bombers and other types equipment and weapons human interest angles aviation knowledge (manufacturers, archive material, etc.) and a glossary of service terminology. Jieitai Moderu Korekushon (SDF Model Collection) Launched in March 2013, this collection featured a model of a specific major item of SDF military hardware released every two weeks. Content related to the subject—be it an aircraft, tank or ship—was covered in the accompanying magazine. Other regular sections included an ongoing account of the 60 years of SDF history, which had actually reached 2015 in the final issue (Part 70), an interview with a serving SDF officer and a visit to an SDF facility (in this case Ainouchi Army Camp in Sasebo, Nagasaki Prefecture). Dai-niji Sekaitaisen Kessakuki Korekushon Its SDF series having run its course, deAgostini started this latest fortnightly collection in February 2016. As a lure, the first issue, on the Kawanishi Shiden-kai fighter, was offered at half the normal price. Accompanying each 1/72nd die-cast scale model is a magazine (sample pages below) with sections covering the aircraft’s development and inner workings. These are complemented by pilot bios, details of the type’s combat record and colour schemes as well as by a performance comparison with its Allied rivals. Upcoming Japanese subjects in the series naturally include the Zero (No. 2), Hayabusa (No. 4) and Raiden (No. 5). Aircraft Recognition Test Answers In trials, it was discovered that the maximum dive angle was only 50°. In June 1936, Ernst Udet took the He 118 on a test flight but after commencing his first dive from about 13,000 feet the propeller suddenly feathered, shearing the reduction gears, and the He 118 disintegrated, leaving Udet to parachute to safety. The Ju 87 repeatedly demonstrated dives at 90 degrees with no trouble, and so won the contract. Heinkel complained in his biography that Udet ignored instructions and flew the aircraft outside of its limits. He suggests that the failure doomed his design, in spite of being unable to dive vertically like the Stuka. Of the 15 He 118s built, two went to Japan where they were designated DXHe, however the aircraft disintegrated during Japanese flight tests. The 13-Shi (1939) design specification that led to the Yokosuka D4Y naval dive bomber may have been inspired by the He 118, Ώ] but otherwise the two aircraft had little in common. ΐ] Heinkel used another example as a flying testbed for the Heinkel HeS 3 turbojet, with the jet engine slung under its fuselage. Although its pilot took off and landed using the He 118's piston engine, he started the turbojet engine in flight and flew under its power in July 1939, the first time an aircraft flew under jet power. The following month the similarly powered, fixed conventional landing gear-fitted Heinkel He 178 V1 would make the first flight powered entirely by a turbojet engine. Α] Seaforth Highlanders Pipes and Drums at Catania Stadium, Sicily in August 1943. British troops in Catania. The decisions taken by Alexander on 13 and 16 July dictated the form that the campaign would take. By giving Montgomery the use of Highway 124 he had made the Eighth Army the principal agent by which Messina should be captured, and relegated the Seventh to a secondary role. With XIII and XXX Corps advancing on two fronts towards Catania and Enna respectively, the expectation was that Catania would quickly be occupied but a stalemate developed as the German defences stiffened south of the city. Montgomery’s attempt to broaden his front there by moving 51st (Highland) Division up on the left of XIII Corps, which might have outflanked the enemy, was too late. On 16 July Alexander took the decision to move both of the British corps eastwards – only for them to run directly into the Axis defence line known as the Hauptkampflinie which Kesselring had agreed with Generals Hube and Guzzoni. The Axis forces in Sicily were now, de facto, under the command of the Germans, and General Hube was an effective instrument to carry out their policy – which was not wholly communicated to the Italians – of fighting a defensive battle which would lead to eventual evacuation of the island. As outlined earlier, on 16 July Hitler ordered further reinforcements into Sicily. The one-armed General der Panzertruppen Hans Valentin Hube’s XIV Panzer Corps Headquarters arrived and took firm control of the German forces, which now included the remainder of 1st Parachute Division (less one regiment), which arrived from Avignon, and much of 29th Panzer Grenadier Division which crossed the Messina Straits from Calabria. The Luftwaffe flak batteries were brought into action as field artillery. Whatever Kesselring may have told Hube about the potential for driving the Allies back into the sea, Hube was clear in his own mind that a progressive withdrawal was the only feasible strategy. He had also received secret orders to keep the Italians out of planning, and was to gain control of all Italian units still in Sicily. His task was to save as many German forces as possible for future operations. By 2 August, Hube would be in control of all Sicilian operations. Every move that the British made on the Catania Plain could be observed from the slopes of Mount Etna. Hube had sufficient forces to counter any advance XIII Corps could make, but no proper reserves. While 5th and 50th Divisions attempted to progress northwards, the Hermann Göring Division and the Fallschirmjäger dug in firmly. The first of the defence lines which the Axis command established to protect the withdrawal to the Straits of Messina, the Hauptkampflinie, ran along the route of the road just west of Santo Stefano, south to Nicosia and Agira, then east to Regalbuto before heading south again to Catenanuova, eastwards along the Dittaino River, and ran across the northern edge of the Catania Plain, reaching the coast about six miles south of that city. The line therefore ran all of the way from the northern to the eastern seaboards, taking advantage of the mountainous terrain, a river bank, and the Catania Plain with its broken countryside. Fifteen miles behind this line the Germans planned the Etna Line, from San Fratello south to Troina and then east to Adrano (which was also known as Aderno in some accounts) and along the road which ran eastwards along the southern edge of Etna to the sea at Acireale. Behind this, the innermost defence line which protected the north-eastern evacuation sites ran from Mount Pelato through Cesaro and Bronte to the sea near Riposto. The three lines were based on natural features which lent themselves to defence, and which could be strengthened by demolishing roads and bridges and by the laying of minefields and booby-traps. The defences were beginning to be established, albeit not yet firmly, by 17 July. The anchor of the Hauptkampflinie was Catania – and it was here that Montgomery pressed XIII Corps to attack. Between 16 and 22 July the Axis operations were focused on three, largely independent, areas. In the east, forces largely made up from the Hermann Göring Division held the line of the Dittaino River from Dittaino Station to the sea, forty-two miles to the east and four miles south of Catania. Alongside the Hermann Göring Division were elements of 1st Parachute Division, part of the Livorno Division, and 76 Infantry Regiment from the Napoli Division. Facing them were XIII Corps and 51st Division from XXX Corps. In the centre of the Axis front, 15th Panzer Grenadier Division was withdrawing from a line which ran through the towns of Caltanissetta, Pietraperzia, Barrafrance, Piazza Armerina, and then north-westwards to the Leonforte-Nicosia area. Here, 1st Canadian Division was in contact with the enemy at the eastern end of the twenty-mile line. At the western end of this sector, 1st (US) and 45th (US) Divisions were in pursuit. The westernmost section of the Hauptkampflinie was the most fluid. Here the Italian XII Corps, comprising the Assietta and Aosta Divisions, most of the Corps artillery and three Mobile Groups, had been ordered back to defend a forty-five mile length of line on Highway 120 running from Cerda through Petralia to Nicosia. Harassed in their retirement by American troops and aircraft, some of the Italian columns were destroyed as they moved along the narrow roads. The defence line was very long, and was not continuous. Formations were not firmly linked together, and the forces were thinly stretched in theory, it should have been possible for attackers to feel out weak spots through which to thrust deep into enemy territory. In practice, however, the terrain dictated otherwise, and the climate did not help. The road-bound Allies were tied to the narrow, winding routes which were frequently even more constrained by the stone walls which bordered them. The most practical directions along which to advance were generally the most obvious – and the most obvious places to concentrate the defences. The Allies were further hindered by their lack of animal transport. During the planning stages for HUSKY seven companies of pack-mules were included in the Eighth Army’s Order of Battle, but these were not included when priorities were established for shipping men and materiel to Sicily. On 17 July, Eighth Army signalled to Middle East that ‘No Pack Transport Units are required by 8th Army in Sicily’. Although local mule trains were organised, they were too small and too untrained to achieve anything more than small tasks. From Alexander’s perspective, the Eighth Army appeared to be the formation best situated to achieve the objective of seizing Messina and sealing off the enemy’s escape route. Not only were the British well-positioned – on the map – to push up the eastern coast of Sicily, but there was also the legacy of the performance of the Americans and British in North Africa, which left a lingering mistrust of Seventh Army’s reliability. Alexander had confidence, built upon evidence of past performance, in Montgomery. But Monty’s assertion, on 12 July, that Catania would be in his hands two days later failed to materialise – as did his revised target of reaching the city on the 16th. Alexander’s faith in Montgomery had led him to accept the redefinition of the Anglo-American armies’ boundary the failure to push 45th (US) Division rapidly northwards on Highway 112 had cost him the opportunity to split Sicily in two quickly and to forestall the Germans’ window of opportunity to inject fresh forces into the island and to stabilise their defence lines. Montgomery’s strategy, accepted by Alexander, effectively sent the Eighth Army in diverging directions to objectives forty-five miles apart – XIII Corps towards Catania, and XXX Corps towards Enna – while the American Seventh Army was left without a real role in achieving the objective of securing Messina, other than protecting the British left flank. As the Catania front became stalemated, so Monty tried to extend it by bringing 51st (Highland) Division from XXX Corps up on the left of XIII Corps, but he was too late to affect a decisive blow against the enemy defences. Alexander’s decision to push both corps eastwards, taken on 16 July, was also too late to bring about the desired result. By this time the Axis defences had become sufficiently well knitted together to prevent the success of the strategy. On 18 July Montgomery decided that 50th Division would hold fast in the Primosole area, while 5th Division would strike about three and a half miles west of the bridge, towards Misterbianco. The line of attack was to cross the Gornalunga and Simeto Rivers any further west and it would have had to cross the Dittaino River as well. On the night of 18-19 July 13 Brigade succeeded in making a shallow bridgehead across the Simeto, through which 15 Brigade mounted an attack at 0130 hours on the 20th. The attack faded out, partly because the infantry battalions’ positions were unclear to the supporting artillery – all eight field and one medium regiments of it – and they were unable to bring effective fire down to assist the advance. In fact the infantry had advanced about three thousand yards before being brought to a halt by machine guns and mortar fire from the enemy who were situated in the gullies and ditches which criss-crossed the ground north of the river. A later attempt to restart the assault came to nothing when enemy defensive fire caused confusion and delay, and the division was ordered to consolidate where it was, pending changes in plans. Further west again, by another eleven miles, Montgomery had hoped that 51st (Highland) Division would be in Paterno by the night of 20 July. General Wimberley intended to reach that town at speed, using his ‘Arrow Force’ on the right and 154 Infantry Brigade on the left. Arrow Force was an all-arms battle group based on Headquarters 23 Armoured Brigade, with 50th RTR (less two troops), 11th (Honourable Artillery Company) Regiment RHA, 243rd Antitank Battery RA, a company from 1/7th Middlesex Regiment – the Division’s medium machinegun battalion – and 2nd Battalion The Seaforth Highlanders. As such, it was a self-sufficient formation capable of acting relatively independently. Paterno, however, was difficult to approach tactically, being on the far side of three rivers, the Simeto, the Dittaino and the Gornalunga. To get there, either the enemy defences at Sferro or Gerbini had to be penetrated the two towns protected alternative routes. Arrow Force succeeded in making a shallow bridgehead over the Dittaino at Stimpano, on the Gerbini route, by 18 July, while 154 Brigade advanced through Ramacca with 152 Brigade behind it as the reserve which would exploit whichever route proved most promising. 153 Brigade was to the right moving on Sferro. Now Wimberley changed the direction of his advance, sending 154 Brigade through the Stimpano bridgehead towards Motta Station and 153 to Sferro with the intention of forcing a bridgehead across the Dittaino. Both brigades ran into more opposition than expected. 154 Brigade was unable to cross the Simeto by dawn on 19 July. At Sferro, 153 Brigade’s 5th Battalion of The Black Watch made a bridgehead and dug in with mortars and antitank guns. The battalion was supported by machineguns from the Middlesex, and the guns of 127th Field Regiment RA. The defenders of Sferro brought down heavy fire on them from artillery, tanks and mortars, causing some sixty casualties, including the regimental sergeant major, who was killed when the battalion headquarters was hit. With enemy panzers in evidence ahead, and with only a single field artillery regiment in support, a rethink was necessary. Wimberley elected to try to enlarge the Sferro bridgehead that night, and 1st Gordon Highlanders and two companies of 5/7th Gordons moved forward through the fiercest bombardment they had ever endured to do just that. They crossed the railway line and then the main road, and 1st Gordons established their headquarters in the station yard, packed with goods wagons. The 5/7th Gordons’ companies forced their way into the village, but lost wireless contact when their radio sets were knocked out in the street fighting. They stayed, isolated, and were shot up by German 88mm guns and armoured cars when dawn broke. The Gordons were to remain in the bridgehead, unable to expand it in the face of stubborn enemy opposition, until 24 July. Wimberley began to feel that his division was over-extended. On his right, the enemy defences appeared to be the strongest, and not the place to attack. However, he did not wish to redeploy his troops away from there, for to surrender the ground which they had already seized would mean that XIII Corps would have to retake it, should they find it necessary to move through the area. A renewed attack at Sferro was an option, but it was becoming clear that the enemy defences were firmly anchored on the area of Gerbini airfield, two thousand yards north of the positions now occupied by 154 Brigade. Wimberley decided that Gerbini should be taken during the night of 20/21 July by the brigade, supported by a squadron of tanks from 46 RTR and three artillery regiments. 1st Battalion Black Watch, followed by the 7th Battalion and the 7th Battalion Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders led the attack. 1st Black Watch became pinned down in front of the heavily defended barracks. 7th Black Watch, supported by the tanks, attacked the airfield, again against stiff opposition. The Argylls attacked Gerbini along the railway line, with artillery assistance, and after three hours of hard fighting gained their objective. The Argyll carriers and mortars, covered by a squadron of Shermans, moved up to join them, but the enemy – probably the Reconnaissance Unit and most of the 2nd Battalion Panzer Regiment, and two battalions from 2nd Panzer Grenadier Regiment, all of the Hermann Göring Division quickly responded with heavy fire and infiltration. The Argylls’ A Company was surrounded by enemy with tanks and was forced to surrender. Before dawn most of the 1st Battalion of The Black Watch were also committed, and finally reached the barracks, which had by now been abandoned by the Germans. By 1030 hours a German counter-attack regained the ground they had lost. The action cost the Argylls eighteen officers, including the CO, and 160 men. 46 RTR lost eight Shermans, and the squadron commander dead. Eight miles to the northwest of Sferro, XXX Corps planned the capture of a bridge over the Dittaino at Catenanuova that same night. The unit which was to carry out this task was 7th Battalion Royal Marines, a force which had provided the now redundant Beach Bricks, the troops that had administered (with medical, signals, ordnance, service corps, anti-aircraft units and the Royal Naval Commandos) each of the British landing beaches on D Day, but which was now reunited. With inadequate transport resources, much of the battalion had to hitch-hike its way sixty miles inland to join XXX Corps. The battalion was extremely tired – its work on the beaches had been very strenuous, and many men had been working in salt water for long periods during that stage of the landings. Their feet had become softened, and the long march to their present location had added to the difficulties. Furthermore, because of the limitations on transport, much equipment had yet to be brought forward. This included digging tools. As the two wings of XXX Corps were on divergent courses, a dangerous gap was emerging at Catenanuova through which enemy armour might infiltrate. Two companies from 7 RM provided cover for the Corps Headquarters from this threat, and on 19 July fresh orders were given to the Marines which placed them under command of 51st Division, with the primary task of establishing a roadblock at Lennaretto, which would cover the division’s left flank. A further task, to establish a bridgehead over the Dittaino and the railway line beyond it, was also ordered. Once this had been achieved, the battalion was to advance of Catenanuova. The codename LEOPARD was given to this crossing, with 153 Brigade’s bridgehead at Sferro being named JAGUAR. A third bridgehead to the east, through which 152 Brigade was advancing, was christened LION. The Royal Marines were supported in the attack to gain their bridgehead by a troop of Shermans, two batteries of 6-pounder antitank guns, a medium machine gun platoon of the Middlesex, and a battery of 3.7 inch howitzers. At 1400 hours, 19 July, two of the marine companies reached the battalion rendezvous south of two mountains which lay about 3,000 yards south of the intended river crossing site. They prepared a hot meal for the remainder of the battalion, which arrived two hours later. With reassurance from the Carrier Platoon of 4/5th Gordon Highlanders that the track ahead was suitable for mechanical transport, the plan was firmed up for one Marine company with an antitank gun to establish the roadblock at Lennaretto, while the remainder of the battalion made a night march and assault to secure the bridgehead over the Dittaino. The Gordons’ brief reconnaissance had indicated that no enemy were present south of the river, but that some movement had been seen on the north bank. At dusk, 2000 hours, two companies moved forward and occupied the pass between the two mountains immediately north of the rendezvous point a third passed through them and crossed the river without incident until Italian troops in a building near the railway raised the alarm. The position was taken at the point of the bayonet and several prisoners were taken. To the right, the first of the companies that had secured the pass moved up and crossed, again taking prisoners, and the third company advanced into the centre. By 0500 hours the far bank was secure, and some 100 Italian and fifty German prisoners were in the bag. The infantry may have been on the north bank, but behind them the supporting antitank guns were having difficulties in coming forward to the position. The track between the two mountains was poor. It had never been used for motorised transport and the edge was crumbling, and a Bren carrier and two portees carrying 6-pounder guns went over the edge into a deep ravine there was no possibility of tanks or artillery using the track. The Marines were without support apart from those few antitank guns which had made it to a ridge south of the Dittaino. To compound their problems, the ground which the Royal Marines occupied was hard and rocky, and impervious to digging. Moreover, it was overlooked by two features to the north, Razor Ridge and the Fico d’India. Enemy on the second of these could enfilade British troops huddled in the only cover available, the railway embankment and the banks of the river. Soon the Marines came under very heavy fire from an assortment of weapons, directed from observation posts beyond the range of anything the British had. Self-propelled guns, Nebelwerfers (multi-barrelled mortars) heavy machine guns and 88mm guns firing airbursts, together with snipers, all pitched in. One 88mm gun was destroyed by the antitank guns south of the river before they in turn were put out of action by the Nebelwerfers. Four carriers attempted to bring the battalion’s 3-inch mortars across the river, but one bellied down on the approach, and although the other three came into action they were soon knocked out. As they shop in the city’s bustling Prope shopping street, there will be those who are aware of Tokorozawa Aviation Museum Saitama Prefecture 359-0042, Japan Tel: (+81) 42 996 2225 / Fax: +81 42 996 2531 If the museum restaurant and terrace are too overrun, J-HangarSpace can recommend two possible alternatives: Announcements JASDF Airshows in 2020 Airshows in 2019 JGSDF Airshows in 2020 Airshows in 2019 JMSDF Airshows in 2019 Watkins
Watkinson
Watson
Weatherley
Weatherly-Campbell
Weaver-Wellet
Webber
Weber
Weber
Wedell-Williams
Weeks
Weeks-Riggs
Weick
Weidmann
Weinberg
Weiss
Welch
Weller Flugzeugbau
Weller-Lusk
Wellington
Wells
Wells
Welsh
Welsher
Wendt
Wendt
Werkheiser & Matson
Werkspoor
Wesley
Weser
West Coast
Westbrook
Westermayer
Western
Western
Western
Western
Western Aircraft
Western Aircraft Supplies
Westfall
Westfield
Westfield
Westland
Weymann
Weymann-Lepere
Weyrauch
Wezel
Whatley
Wheelair
Wheeler
Wheeler
Wheeling
Whigham
Whitcraft
White
White
White
White
White
White
White & Thompson
White's
White-Kremsreiter
Whitehead
Whitehead
Whiteman
Whitman
Whitney
Whittaker
Whittelsey
Whittemore-Hamm
Whittenbeck
Whittenburg
Wibault
Wibault significant projects
Wichita
Wickham
Wickner
Widerøe
Wieber
Wienberg
Wigal
Wight
Wilbur
Wilcox
Wilcox
Wilder
Wilden
Wildfire Air Racing
Wiley Post
Wilford
Willard
Williams
C W Williams
O E Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams International
Williams Texas-Temple
Williamson
Willoughby
Willoughby
Wills Wing
Wilson
Wilson
Wilson
Wilson
Wilson
Wilson
Windecker
Winds Italia
Windstar
Windspire
Windward Performance
Examples:
Video Example(s):
Japanese-Language Part-Works
Published by Hachette Collections Japan Inc.
Latest Japanese subject edition (Oct. 2015): No. 159 1/200 Tachikawa Ki-74 (see JWings Feb. 2015, above)
2,047 yen (incl. tax, also available via amazon.co.jp)
View the expanded lineup by clicking on Feature03/Update here [link]
Published by K.K. DeAgostini Japan
Final edition (Nov. 2015): Part 70/Mitsubishi T-2 in Blue Impulse markings
2,371 yen (excl. tax, also available via amazon.co.jp)
Issue listing viewable here [link]
(Clicking on the issue number reveals an enlargeable photo of each model)
http://deagostini.jp/jmc
(Classic World War II Aircraft Collection)
Published by K.K. DeAgostini Japan
First edition (Feb. 2016): Kawanishi Shiden-kai
1,999 yen (incl. tax, also available via amazon.co.jp)
Series outline viewable here [link]
The answers to the aircraft recognition test included in the review (in the Aviation Books: Japanese Language/Historical section) of J-BIRD: Japanese Aircraft Register 1924–1945 are as follows: J-BAOW and J-BAOX are both Airspeed Envoys (more accurately licence-built Mitsubishi Hinazuru) and J-BAOY a Nakajima AT-2. The latter design was militarized for production as the Army Type 97 Transport (Ki-34, Allied codename Thora).
Production and testing [ edit ]
THE PLAIN OF CATANIA – 1943 Part I
Tokorozawa’s place in the annals of Japanese aviation history. That there are many
who are not in itself justifies the existence of the Tokorozawa Aviation Museum.
(Photo: November 2013)(Photo: February 2020)
Map in park across from Kōkūkōen Station, marked on left in orange (Photo: February 2020)
Namiki 1-13, Tokorozawa City
The Re:4 coffee shop, which at off-peak times provides an oasis of calm on the ground floor corner of the Warawara Fitness Club, diagonally across from the YS-11 and thus close to Kōkūkōen Station. ( Namiki 2-1, Tokorozawa, Saitama Prefecture 359-0042)
The Henri Farman Café Bar, which is straight ahead of you at the top of the first flight of stairs/escalator on the way into Kōkūkōen Station from the same east (YS-11) side. Some outside seating is available for non-smokers. Look out for the 1911 in the sign above the shop window.
In need of qualification, the statement on the sign itself reads: Tokorozawa is a memorable city where the Japanese flew into the sky for the first time. On April 5, 1911, an altitude of 10m, a distance of 800m, a time of 1 minute and 20 seconds were recorded.
Airshows in 2021
Nov. 3 Iruma
Dec. 5 Nyutabaru
All cancelled
Mar. 2 Komaki
Apr. 14 Kumagaya
May 19 Shizuhama
June 2 Hofu-Kita
June 2 Miho
Aug. 4 Chitose
Aug. 25 Matsushima
Sept. 8 Misawa
Sept. 16 Komatsu
Oct. 13 Ashiya
Oct. 20 Hamamatsu
Nov. 3 Iruma
Nov. 9 Komaki
Nov. 10 Gifu
Nov. 23 Kasuga
Dec. 1 Hyakuri
Dec. 7-8 Naha
Dec. 8 Tsuiki
Dec. 15 Nyutabaru
Airshows in 2021
TBA
With exception of
Akeno (only limited
access), all cancelled
Jan. 13 Narashino
(paratroop display)
Apr. 13 Kasuminome
Apr. 13 Somagahara
May 12 Takayubaru
June 1 Kasumigaura
June 16 Kita-Utsunomiya
June 23 Okadama
Oct. 6 Metabaru
Nov. 3 Akeno
Nov. 9 Tachikawa
Nov. 17 Naha
Nov. 24 Yao
Dec. 8 Kisarazu
Tachikawa
Airshows in 2021
TBA
Apr. 27 Atsugi
Apr. 28 Kanoya
May 5 Iwakuni
(joint Friendship Day)
May 18 Maizuru
May 19 Ohmura
July 13-14
Komatsushima
July 27 Tateyama
Sept. 21 Hachinohe
Oct. 20 Ozuki
Oct. 26 Shimofusa
Nov. 17 Tokushima
Unable to write: disc is full (R) over, (F) format, (Z) won # 911?
Definitely a great answer
I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
and everything, and the variants?